– you can download the PDF | ||||||

abstract | ||||||

Finally exact precisely because it hinges on the authentic π . (download).
After having declaimed its absolute importance, as geometric and independent of the monument that revealed it to me, precisely in order to highlight its extraordinary properties above any debate on architectural measurements, and having illustrated step by step increasingly more exciting characteristics for the mathematical world
– which is why the 4 concentric and tangent golden circles represent only the starting stage – at this point it was worth taking almost present in the proportions of the monument, while leaving one's mouth dry like a mirage in who is thirsty to know and understand.
If on the one hand the squaring of the circle has been declared impossible, on the other the pyramid seems to offer us at least one proof, or an undertone, so stimulating and compelling as to provoke the minds and ambitions of scholars, irresistibly attracted by such a miracle, as if its evidence necessarily had to make sense; therefore be possible, not to say obvious. It thus appears easier and more sensible to accept the challenge than to give up and be left with a bad taste in the mouth; even if the solution appears unattainable. This page unfolds in five arguments, three of which are primary, the fourth, unexpected and disconcerting, final and clear proof of the lack of precision of the official π finally, conclusive and synoptic for an overall acquisition of the philosophical and representative potential, and a historical-conceptual placement related in part on the next page.
## April 2024 -from Divine Triangle to Great PyramidThousands of pages describe and hypothesize on this topic, mostly retracing what others have deduced or written; many improvise their articles to spread, if not discover, what mysteries the Great Pyramid hides; and since its entire construct inevitably takes shape on the Web with approximate and experimental arguments, everything becomes plausible...However, since the numbers never add up (nor could they), several fascinating hypotheses run aground on the 'very near' issue; and this is because we don't focus on the first and greatest of these secrets, which connects them all: it is the Divine Golden Triangle, which the more than monumental construction has bestowed upon us in the silence of millennia, brought back to view by me – since it has certainly not always been unknown – and proposed at 360° since 2002 as the 'third treasure of geometry'. A geometric and mathematical expression of the Vital Power, which in the following years has strengthened in the eyes of my research to the point of assuming absolute validity, as it contains the major compositional forces of phenomenal reality: the Golden Section and the π. Of this figure, which I have already demonstrated to be unique and absolutely special due to its immediate characteristics, two other prerogatives of fundamental importance emerge precisely from traditions relating to the pyramid in defining the Squaring of the Circle, for which I have started this latest research of mine. It is therefore through it that everything becomes harmonious, responsive and unequivocal. Let's retrace its most salient components. ## transcendence of the circle
At the beginning the question one might ask is right The circle requires a center to be produced, a center which in turn disappears since it has no geometric consistency in any dimension. I introduced its graphic dynamics in my essay «2x2=3,14» pg. 5-6 Immediately following the circle, with 2 lines or sides we observe any angle, which in a certain sense modulates and relates to the circle every geometric figure with a greater number of sides. 2 is not a symbol of a whole, but indicates subdivision, as symbolized by the two sides that depart from the vertex of the angle.The most representative ideal angle could be that of 38°10 which, touching the inside of circle 1, due to the symmetrical property of the 2 sides that meet it, generates the perfect 3 that we will see. I have already mentioned the properties of the subsequent fundamental figures with 3, 4 and 5 sides on the page Square-From-Circle.html; each of them has a beginning and end according to a rational definition, which allows calculation, modification and comparison with others, where the circle is pure transcendence and containment. It is also interesting to note how the circumference can act as an instrumental unit of measurement and tracing alongside the single straight line, reporting and establishing distances using a ruler and compass. Here we are interested in the pure transcendence of the circle, as – according to an archaic wisdom that has been lost, but whose echo has fortunately not died out – it can descend to the immanent plane. Evidently such a very high level process had to and could be expressed through a geometric structure, and therefore implemented for its own prerogatives, condensing its presuppositions in the correlation of flat and solid figures with perfect symbolic correspondence to the ritual contents. This long speech crystallizes in the expression ‘Squaring the Circle’, which from what I will explain could actually be the title to be attributed to the Great Pyramid. ## the deity of the triangleEven though they are fundamental for the study of the construction and the mysteries it hides within it, from the first graphic findings that guided me to the heart of its ideal canon – which shines through and reaffirms itself more and more as its development advances – I preferred to follow a logic that started from the inside rather than the outside of its real measurement. A measure which for the writer is synonymous with essence, entity, vibration and symbol, even if the etymology adapts to both sides of the research.
According to the surveys obtained from the most accurate The first image of still limited size can be enlarged off the page in The second view also in vector format, at that time practically cut by the screen, being almost quadruple in size given a starting graphic format: width="4238", height="3238" points, to allow a numerical verification I had to complete it with the red path, which highlights even more near the vertices the precision of the triangular section.
Compatibly with the approximations forced by the graphic tools used, with passages from one to the other starting from lengths to three decimals, they give impeccable testimony of the relationships tending to Φ with a correspondence up to the 5th decimal of the golden ratio ½base÷height of 0.78615, more than sufficient to indicate the underlying presence of the Great Golden Triangle, which we will see below in a unitary way, and completely surpass improvised measurements, or those documented by widespread drawings for schematic purposes. I soon became aware, let's say with insight, of the first truly unusual, indeed absolutely unique, potentialities of the large triangle, which lit up before my eyes, then and there astonished, like four spotlights with a light of increasing intensity.An extraordinary choreography that could not fail to surprise me, maybe witness to a hidden memory. They were the first messengers of the total Divine Proportion of that supreme triangle, always ready to give much more than appeared at first sight. I was immediately certain that unlimited wisdom took shape in this figure; but at the moment my commitment was oriented towards the '5 Rites' and the 4 Elements that they evoked, so much so as to make the Great Pyramid symbol of it, yet I overlooked the Squaring of the Circle of which only the myth echoed, without realizing that I was outlining it in the entire work in progress. Let's ^{0}, we can immediately note that the 2nd concentric circle with diameter scaled to Φ, is tangent to the two symmetrical sides of the Triangle. The 3rd circle of diameter Φ^{2} follows, in apparent suspension, but which, brought down into the area below in tangency to the external circle, is in turn tangential to the base of the Triangle, stating its distance from the circle, as well as to the 4th circle of diameter Φ^{3}, since the latter is also tangent to the base of the internal side Triangle, stating its distance from the center.
There are many things to read in this diagram, of such apparent simplicity. The height of the triangle is Φ, which is equivalent to the radius 0.5 + Φ ^{2}÷2; you can see it by moving the 2nd circle upwards, tangential to the external circle, with an effect on the base that mirrors that of the 3rd circle below. Incomparable vibrational synergy.
This golden concatenation in itself already led to further developments, mentioned from my first approach, in the development of an essay that was not intended for this, but whose overall contents would take me far in the following 22 years.
This first Great Triangle is the maximum, direct and essential expression of the total Divine Proportion: as it presents a base on which the two sides constitute an agreement, related to the base in full and exclusive ratio φ.
It is the Creative Principle that generates the two opposite complementary poles, Father and Mother, purposeful and receptive, expansion and contraction whose product is equal to 1 and to the O `T` Extreme thinkable synthesis of the numerical ratio: `Φ : 1 = 1 : φ ` .
As such it is suited to admirably representing the splitting or subdivision of the Primal Oneness, in the greatest conceivable harmonious balance. It's not just this that surprises us, its area couldn't be any less. Four months later, a new study on the `π` and `Φ` ratio led me to also delve into the parameters of its area, from which it appears that:
Therefore, the many approximations or intuitions that have run aground due to presumed, even small, lacks of precision, while in reality they could have been completely successful by applying the right parameters, matter little.
In reality the general error is upstream, and I really hope to have highlighted it in my introductory treatise, followed by far too many indirect evidences.
A minimal flaw, but enough to make one reject it, or give up any aim for accuracy so as not to contradict its academic definition; even if in this case it is precisely the one that has gone overboard, with its claim to assert itself precisely where it feels least safe. Many doors and adjustments will open, in addition to those presented here, once the π 3.14460 will be officially recognized.
When it comes to ascertaining dimensions such as those of the monument, worn down over millennia and eroded by natural agents and man, and the measurements are obviously inconsistent, depending on the methods and instruments used, it is very difficult to raise certainties that do not boil down to just opinions. ## the immanence of the squareTo continue relating to the Φ ratio for the purposes of a direct and immediate demonstration, I will now not attribute a unit value to the circle in which the triangle is inscribed, but to the one traced with the center at its vertex, and radius equal to its height, which will therefore be = 0.5.From the 1 sublimated in the Circle, which is for the created = Φ × φ, we have seen the primigenial Unity to split admirably into the Supreme Triangle, through which we witness its manifestation in the dense world, configuring itself in the square of its roots, or the four sides of 7.8615, which make a perimeter of 3.1446, equal to the circumference of diameter 1.
Since Φ it is the golden number, I proposed right during an exchange of ideas with the astrophysicist Richard Ravenhall at academia.edu, to call 7.8615 the 'platinum number'.
As if on purpose, the atomic number of platinum is 78! and so here I propose it again publicly, and here I will attribute the letter – taken following the initial P which in more than one way already belongs to π – suitable for remembering the relationship between half the In this way we will observe the ratio between the circumference and the square of the base, kept constant, varying the height of the triangle as necessary for a comparison between the two versions of π: 3.14159 or 3.14460.
To keep the new measurements referring to a circle with diameter =1, it can be noted that in the previous figure the circle with the center at V (vertex) would pass through the center C, as a tangent to the red dotted diameter of the initial circle.
- a rectangle having as its base ½ the base of the triangle and its oblique side for height (easily portable following the arc of the protractor);
- then a square with a side equal to the height of the triangle.
^{2} = `0.25` , the area of the rectangle, whose base is also the golden section of the height, is given by
`½ × (½ ÷ Φ)` , in numbers:
0,39307568887871164303477928666004 × 0,63600982475703448212621124099997 = `0.25` , as well as
from the base square of the golden rectangle to its total area: `½` :
0.15450849718747371205114670366897 × 1.61803398874989484820458681467588 = `0.25` .
That said, the best is yet to appear, since of the two equal areas, that of the rectangle can be easily divided by a diagonal that divides it into two right triangles, each of which corresponds to half of each face of the Great Pyramid. In fact, placed side by side on the base along the shorter side (triangle without profile, purple background), their repeated rotation of 90° on the axis and the inclination of 51°49'38 brings them together from each side of the base square to the vertex of the triangle which becomes pyramidal! So here we have reached the solid state; all that remains is to verify what has mysteriously been handed down over the millennia from known and unknown sources. The scenario is soon defined: the perimeter of the square with side is 0.78615 ×4 = 3.14460. If the circle with diameter =1 has the same length, i.e. trivially 2 ×0.5 ×π = 3.14460, then π 3.14460!
In short, if inscribed in the circle with radius Φ, the side of the great golden triangle is = ¼ of the circumference, compared to a circle with radius its height, is its base which corresponds to ¼ of the circumference! Given the potential of the great triangle, the force of this axiom is too significant to be ignored. The busillis is only thatIf..., before which we could also stop, for the sake of many academics; but if we have reached this far, it being understood that the π it is elusive from whichever side you approach it, it is worth carrying out further verification of the facts.
To this end I have implemented the opposite path: to make it appear in the same figure of indisputable precision, also the variants that derive from applying to the π the current value 3.14159. Please keep in mind that I have purposely used very thin lines in the PDF diagram which reproduces both (you can open or download it by clicking on the figure), in order to allow the vision of the most accurate details and the right proportions through adequate zoom on a good reader, for dimensions that the browser may not be able to render sufficiently. Always tangent to the unchanged base of the triangle, a new circle must be added to the first one, already with perimeter 3.14460 and radius 0.5, whose radius, in order to obtain from π 3.14159 the perimeter 3.14460 will become 3.14460 ÷ 3.14159 ÷ 2 = 0.5004790.573 / 5.000 This radius, i.e. the new height of the triangle, will give rise to a square with an area 0.250479 _{q} greater than 0.25_{q}, whereas the rectangle flanked by the new length of the oblique side will no longer be golden, nor will its area ever be equivalent to that of the square: even without producing calculations, it will be a good exercise to imagine the disproportions of a rectangle with a fixed base, with a square of multiplied height, for an area always larger, or vice versa of minimum height, until it is reduced to a small fraction of the hypothetical rectangle.
Details of the enlarged figure, at the vertex we can observe the slightest difference in the tracing of the triangle with the height of the second hypothesis; at the top the almost symbolic difference between the two circles, which if they were not tangent to the base, would even be halved from view. All this can prove very useful in helping us evaluate how the diagrams presented and proposed since past centuries are responsive on one side, but misleading on the other. A few thousandths are enough to disable a theory, while now untraceable data are needed to support it, except... the dominant abstraction of our ‘Great Triangle’. We are faced with a scheme that should inspire on its own, and in truth cannot do more: a single height of the pyramid can make the circumference with equal radius equivalent to its base perimeter, with a square of this side to its triangular faces, and a single π can allow it! Therefore you just have to choose which side to take, whether to adopt a perfect mathematical and geometric manifestation, adapting to what proves to be extraordinary and immeasurable, or to submit and condition the future of research to an ambiguous constant that is never defined except by approximate progressions, and which precludes any possible advancement. One is a living letter, and will remain so forever; the other is only an artifice, useful up to a certain point, but constituted by a misleading transcendence. As I have already argued, the circle itself is the transcendent being. ## redraft or defeat of π?
Precisely in terms of the reverse path, a detail comes in handy that could help to better focus on certain implications in the choice of π.
It deals with a numerical event that left me literally speechless for at least a day and a night... for the absurdity it represented. In the new figure we immediately notice that the two intersections of the circumference with the base of the square take place with remarkable precision on the two sides of the triangle, as if to establish the absoluteness of the numerical and geometric relationship. It must be said that the most widespread drawings for reproducing this relations do not highlight this crucial meeting point for the three figures, since they do not realize that the circle belongs, due to its symbolic, celestial value, to the top of the pyramid, the vertex, not the earthly center of the base; a detail that gives the figure what we could consider a notable added value. Except at an appropriate magnification, the intersection appears with impressive accuracy exactly where it shouldn't, since it is the external circle, the red one resulting from the artifice of π 3.14159, which intersects the crossing of the base of the original square (pale green, horizontal) with the profile of the artificial triangle of greater height (in grey).The base of the square centered on the new height is far from these two screens, as their magnification is 6400% of a 2.52 meter base diagram! but it is clearly visible dotted in red in the PDF [click], which can render quite thin lines for a thorough examination. All of this is nonsense; nonetheless, after such a display of perfect geometric and mathematical combinations, uniqueness uniqueness uniqueness uniqueness uniqueness highlighted in this long and careful work, it is really difficult to accept a concept of mere randomness in such an example. Anyone who has ever attempted to draw a rPerhaps the π classic claimed its validity? unthinkable with promiscuous figures, no train can run on the tracks of two different railways. Having rechecked my error-free code, all I had to do was rely on such precision for the statement of an error in the basic software..
A pressing need to get out of this trap reminded me of a relevant gap, precisely in the definition of a circle during my initial study on this site (link above), of the relationships between circle, square and Φ. The problem was connected to the use of geometric path PS operators such as arc and arcn responsible for tracing a circle with a code of the type: x y ang1 ang2 arc, placed in the case with: x y 0 360 arc stroke.
I at once replaced it in the drawing with direct personal instructions, reworking it according to the example: and here the border is redefined, incredibly perfect like the first, but now it is the 1st golden circle that intersects the meeting of the base of the square with the profile of the original triangle, even if this does not have an immediate value in the demonstrations that interest us. Since any angular operation is set to π, how I suppose the default 'arc' operator is handled at a low level, likely Bézier curves, a ratio between two legs and a hypotenuse wins out (although greedy for elementary instructions).
By alternating the two figures by touching the image, you can see how this shift depends on the correct tracing of the two circumferences, which in the first phase are more compressed and closer to each other; this is the reason why the view appears shifted, even though it was obtained by keeping the zoom window fixed. With the same magnification in the PDF I made visible on the right side at 3 o'clock, above and below the vertex of the purple square, the 0.5° step between the start and end of the circles drawn by my code above. Almost nothing that can be seen with the naked eye under normal conditions, but only with this enormous magnification; and I wouldn't rule out that the cause lies precisely in the use of π 3.14159. It may help to understand that the PDF file in which a single circle is obtained with the arc operator is 28Kb, compared to 145Kb in the accurate file; but the problem π remains at the forefront. For this reason I entrusted the above complete SVG image to the lighter standard method (126Kb versus 265Kb), given that its illustrative purpose requires clearly visible thicker lines, for which a comparison, although possible, would still be less than satisfactory. Even if the definition of each angle in the above algorithm can suffer micrometric deviations by applying 3.14159 or 3.14460, according to Pythagoras Sine and Cosine the x, y coordinates of a Cartesian axis system must deal with a constant Radius, at which the instruction 'arc' does not adjust, squeezing thus every quarter of the circumference.
Considering the accuracy and structural efficiency of the magnificent PostScript language, it now comes clear to me that what I had interpreted as 'a basic software error' is instead the glaring verification of the error produced by the use of π 3.14159, even in the probable use of Bézier curves (of which in fact the approximation is taken for granted, although perhaps theoretically it shouldn't). While aware that the PostScript language is not a CAD but was created to satisfy the typographic world – the reason I document it is the scope of this particular condition; which is why I could only re-produce it by isolating it in a code fragment suitable for a simple, direct and exclusive comparison, free from any possible interference.
In the same work area of 7.143 square points, I entrusted two separate routines with the task of tracing two circles, one in red with the standard Scrolling through the figure with a 6400% zoom or by means of progressive enlargements on the interested areas, you will easily notice two compound effects: - a normal correspondence by superposition of the two curves at the cardinal angles: top, bottom, left, right.
- a progressive distancing of the same which, according to the tangential thrust exemplified in the specialized site above, tends to flatten the curvature of an arch outwards near the ends, and then compress it on the contrary in the central area, as if to compensate the subtraction of curvature imposed on the circle by the polygonal methods of calculating π, invisibly redistributing its effect in each of the 4 quadrants.
Apparently an algorithm not based on individual degrees, as I did, but on the global length of the circumference, to distribute it more quickly along arcs defined by fewer instructions, being based on a π which reduces it by 6.2 thousandths, will never be able to compress it in the axial angles, in which the ray has greater incidence for x or y, but will compromise the radius in the intermediate areas. If it is easy to trust in the absoluteness of the calculations, it is another thing to see them projected into real and effective space; but who will dare to blame the π? Yet, a more explicit demonstration could not have been had! that's enough to derail an aerospace project. I even verified that the deviation is different from one dial to another (probably due to the play of ±), but I wouldn't want to make it more cumbersome than necessary.
In fact, I wonder if we can exclude a reason why this dual effect manifests itself with such precision exactly at the meeting point of triangle, square and circle, underlined precisely by the angular participation of the internal [green] square, as well as where the gap between the two curves is determined by the ratio 3.14159÷3.14460. ## icing on the cake?Thegame is not over yet, since attracted by this stimulating combination I wanted to investigate other relationships that this scheme could reserve; so I shifted my attention to the 45° angular side view of the pyramidal structure.
It was enough to superimpose a profile with a base the diagonal of the square and a height that of the pyramid, a common vertex to both a horizontal and vertical views. Each diagonal of the square centered in this way intersects the circle with two opposite edges of the pyramid, say seen from above. In the new lateral view, however, the two opposite edges of the transversal profile cross the square at two points, joining which the base of a new triangle is delimited, proportional to the profile of which it is part, but scaled to the width of the square. Well this base crosses the intersection of the diagonal of the square (edge of the pyramid) with the circle equivalent to its perimeter, with renewed accuracy. Another victory of perfection, it seems to me like the icing on the cake (or should I say ‘pie’?), however little it may matter.
With or without that icing the cake remains cake, a cherry can add little, but put in the right place it can make the cake unique. ## Or do we want to make it an Art Gallery?It is the turn of the circle circumscribed to the Great Triangle, which I traced in order to examine what the inverted triangle itself, i.e. vertically mirrored, reserves within it; and even in this case it did not disappoint me.The symbol of the two opposing equilateral triangles is certainly not new, but it has never been applied to this formation, at least four times special: - first of all because the sum of the four sides of the two triangles, excluding bases, is equivalent to the perimeter of the circumscribed circle, therefore they are virtually the four sides of the square which is equivalent to that circle, even if differently opposed.
- Then because the segment that joins their median intersection points is equivalent to each of the four sides and is π÷4, I mean 0.78615 or
on the diameter =1 of the circumscribed circle.
This is quickly demonstrated by the internal architecture of the Great Triangle inscribed in that reference circle. As can be seen by retracing the emblematic figure, its ½ base AB is the golden section of the side AV, a ratio commensurate with the height BV that is precisely Φ, which breaks down as we have seen into 0.5 from the center of the circle to the vertex, and 0.118 from the center to the base of the triangle; therefore 0.618. Now, if the ½ base AB is slid upwards, parallel to itself, keeping the end point B along the height BV, its length will be cut at the intersection with the oblique side, according to the ratio established by the height achieved. Therefore, if the height-distance from the vertex from 0.618 has been reduced to 0.5 having reached point C (center of the circle), its proportion with the oblique side will now no longer be Φ, but 50%. At this point, since it is the center of the circle, doubled horizontally it will constitute the axis that unites the two points of intersection of the four sides of the two triangles, a precious reference module for everything that can derive to geometry from the management of the golden section; something I had already introduced in this curious article: “Genesis of the π, as seen by AstroTime”. That means even more simply that the Golden Triangle contains the ‘Platinum’ constant = 0.78615 also in the segment parallel to the base and passing through its center which is the same as the circumscribed circle, extended to meet the two sides. The direct squaring of this circle derives from this.LEGENDA -
More, because while the sides of the triangle (this applies to each of the two) are tangent (purple hatching) to the circle with the center at the vertex of the opposite triangle, intended for quadrature, this occurs exactly at the point of intersection of this circle with the square of the base centered on it, as well as with the circle hosting the triangle, at the top of the base of the inverted triangle partially visible in the figure; an
*incredible*correspondence of 4 lines, two of which are circles!! (only in the PDF page 3 can you clearly watch the discrepancy of the circumference in red, due here too to the incorrect π…) From another perspective, the two circles, the container of the triangle and the one to be squared on its base, meet at two points that exactly intersect the square of the base, wherever it is positioned. The distance between these two points is equivalent to the base length of the triangle, and being equidistant from its center it also turns out to be the base of the same inverted triangle. The large circle with its center at the vertex and tangent to the base of a triangle is tangent to the two sides of the opposite triangle. - What remains is the base of the inverted triangle, which in addition to pointing like a laser at the points of tangency of the sides, in turn is tangent to a reduced circle in Φ scale. from the opposite one of quadrature.
Will they all be cases? or indices of a grandiose harmony that distinguishes at each passage what is pure harmony from improvisation? Who could conceive a plan so proportionate in its most peripheral details? Mathematicians should rejoice, for this is pure poetry, in their domain! I've inserted the graphic in the already prepared PDF. ## the pyramid, power of the fivesurprise that allows access to its metaphysical arcana: it is the Divine Triangle that emerges resplendent from its building as the key to its and many others mysteries that are not only mathematical, bypasses any attempt at reconstruction or theoretical corruption, since it encloses the exact answer to any type of approach, unifying the principles of and Φ which are essentially the same thing, even if this is still ignored, since the equality × 4 = and ^{2} = Φ is ignored. Any effort to understand the Great Pyramid without taking its incidence into account can never be successful.
We have seen so far how the most striking secrets of the pyramid arise from this perfect figure, which represents its ideal profile, like a physical and ultraphysical blueprint.
Other mysteries are woven around these basic qualities, both within it and from it towards sidereal spaces, even if they are not the subject of this study. In the present work I do not propose archaeological tasks, nor as an Egyptologist, nor do I care to delve into the numerological apparatus deriving from the application of specific units of measurement, without taking anything away from their merit or their sacredness though.
Therefore I will only use measurements in meters, degrees and decimals with the necessary minimum approximation; and above all through them, and thanks to the Divine Triangle which is the Driving Source, bring to the right solution some of the most disputed and unresolved statements. On the basis of this solution, it will perhaps be easier and more truthful to correspond to certain geographical and astronomical, planetary and lunar relationships which do not interest this office, but which endlessly intrigue hordes of researchers. Probably, just for the record, the same could help for certain contents of this first scheme, which I developed and made public in 2002, from which I may have inspired more than one theoretical-editorial application in the following years, which arose without naturally citing any source.
To avoid erroneous interpretations in hypothesizing the relationship between the Zed, the spinal column of the pyramid, and the human figure, I only have to point out that it is not the pyramid built to the measure of man, if anything, it's the opposite: the laws that transpire from the monument are prior to the creation of the human being, as well as the egg [cosmic, like it or not], was born before the chicken.The reason for such a unique and irreplaceable architecture, as well as its geographical and geophysical location, did not aim to demonstrate advanced mathematical knowledge to future generations (which they probably would not have understood; after all, that concept of the past and future in which the past is a symbol of beginnings - have you ever asked yourself the question if anyone could ever consider us to be in the first steps of development? ), but rather to build a cosmic instrument that would integrate the main lines of force of the universe for an energetic, or historical and evolutionary, if not also technological purpose of the material world; and we have not yet seen the conclusion. What denotes the astrophysical location of the great pyramid being aimed at expanding its functional value beyond the usual earthly boundaries, or tomb boundaries like many others, is precisely that numerical synergy between all its dimensions that does not represent only numbers, but values and properties that recall other values, according to paths that constitute a real challenge for our unprepared reasoning Essentially responding to the functionality of the π in its occult structure, which I attempted to mention in the essay under the section: § - “The π: 4th dimension & gravitational interaction”, they are like an energetic alphabet common to the entire universe, a metaphysical connection of essential efficiency in the intelligence of creation. Only a targeted device could convey the necessary wisdom; and this is certainly the primary reason why it captivates every kind of scholar, even the most sceptical; because even scientists have a soul.
If for today's researchers hidden chambers and secrets kept inside the pyramid are the most intense challenge, the mathematical aspect is no less; indeed its importance can bring more benefits than the discovery of rules and truths that could remain incomprehensible, except to those who are destined to receive them as events mature. That of a science that has been lost for more than four millennia, or why not? more recently with the destruction of the Library of Alexandria in Egypt, together with the casing of the pyramid – or perhaps I rediscovered it firsthand, through memories that bypass various reincarnations of mine. In any case, my reevaluation of the π it is a theory that reserves only exactitudes and no contraindications, and yet ready to assert itself on the basis of a fundamental statement: If the height H of a pyramid is such that the area of each face is `= H` ,
the perimeter of the base will be `= 2×H×π` .
The 1st assumption makes the ratio between ½base and the height of the faces to be Φ. The 2nd assumption makes the ratio between ½base and the height of the pyramid to be √Φ. Of all this, the π would be the only unknown, which has kept generations of scholars in check, but which in the current time, I repeat, is perhaps the most important discovery after that of fire. Nonetheless, even without taking into account the π, with the changing historical and geological conditions naturally none of the architectural configurations proposed by various authors and researchers over the decades corresponds with indisputable precision to the triangular profile already described. Also because being known just for its local traits, more than for its global meaning, no one tries to emulate it by adapting its measurements to that pattern. Indeed, we have differentiated findings of the sides, angles and inclinations from each other and we cannot glimpse any formulation that can unify them, other than the mathematical average, and not only of the basic perimeter, but even between the measures proposed by the various authors; average and perfection are two entirely different things. So let's see, flower to flower, how they fared. |

[ back || or to the main page ]