Some measures use the comma instead of the period: this allows a more direct copy/paste for testing purposes on those system calculators that require it. Life, Death and Miracles from the PyramidsA passage that I find useful in unravelling some tangles of typically popular credulity, yet attributed to those who knew much more.It must be kept in mind that as much as we know about the Egyptian cult of the dead and the afterlife, our culture is not organized to truly understand the meaning and function of the pyramids, intended as portals to a dimension beyond. If death for our rational corridor can only mean the end of earthly existence, and at most an illdefined passage to the eternal, in Egyptian initiatory cognition it represented the threshold, a true bridge of otherworldly continuity, a notion for which current science is not prepared, and not even the Catholic religion which only manages to distort it to its own advantage.The pharaonic tomb therefore translates from an irreversible cemetery concept, at most of a mausoleum, a monumental tomb dedicated as a terminus for illustrious remains, to an advanced instrument for safeguarding and interconnecting the energetic realities of the deceased, bodies alternate with the physical one and relatively more durable, to a parallel level of existence and operation, which is unknown to us. In the case of the pyramid attributed to Cheops, which instead according to the authoritative clairvoyant Egar Cayce, and others, dates back to more than 10 thousand years, an empty sarcophagus may well represent the opposite of death as the final stage, inviting its location and very special workmanship to be used for ESP experiences. It is this premise, although here exposed in a rudimentary way, that combines the choice and construction of this Great Pyramid, intended more for the function of a single tomb, assuming and not proven that it was so in its unrepeatable location, with that of an interactive cosmic apparatus with higher order frequency levels. According to the study inspired to Eng. Mario Pincherle  Dedicated to the Accademia Dei Lincei in 1969  it was erected as a shell of the Zed, or Djed, primary word and symbol in every Egyptian cult, translated as 'presence', 'stability'; a simulacrum representing an anthropomorphic pillar or a mummified man carrying a sceptre and an ankh cross, symbol of eternal existence, backbone of the god Osiris, otherworldly dispenser of death and rebirth, justice and regeneration, therefore even more than existence in life. There is certainly no need to resort to the Egyptians to affirm that the spinal column is the seat of the vital fluid; I will simply point out the presence of four levels in slabs or spaces, which evoke the four Elements, surmounted by the fifth as a dome. If this is the case, the pyramid is absolutely the most suitable means, perhaps the only adequate one I might add indirectly, to safeguard also in this sense, that is, in the silence of a transitory tomb for the necessary passage of millennia, the most sacred tower of Akkadian or Atlantean origin. … the entity became the supervisor of the excavations, studying the old records and preparing and building the house of records for those of Atlantis, as well as a part of the house for the initiates   namely the Great Pyramid. (retranslated)
The Ancient Atlantean Record at Gizeh
– www.edgarcayce.it
A device perhaps even capable of disintegrating or dissolving into the ether, once it has completed its task of maintenance until the emergence of a new phase of evolution of and on the planet.
The day will come when the tower will render what has been entrusted to it,
the Pyramid will leap like a ram and then the sad iron age will end. (it says from the "Book of Enoch")
And while we're on the subject, let's talk about eternal life, a concept that should be retracted in many articles.
No person with common sense can think or imagine an eternal life. Whoever attributes such a belief to the Egyptian initiates offends with his very naivety an elite that at least taught the Greek and Latin philosophers. First and foremost, because a definition of eternal life after death is a contradiction in terms. The meaning and etymology of ‘Life’ refer to living, never to after being deceased. But above all because anyone of average culture can distinguish material life, or incarnation, from its spiritual coexistence, commonly called soul although in a still raw form, science not having the means to be able to classify or recognize it in its reality; whereas the holy church has made it an object of monopoly and commerce for centuries, misleading and subjugating its believers; and therefore a knowledge still reserved to a few endowed with an advanced capacity to contemplate it on their own. Yet it would be enough to use reason: you don't have to be an occultist to deduce from the very concept of reincarnation the sense of continuity of the true existence, which is not and can never be that of a single life prolonged to infinity. That one can exit with the astral body from one's physical body in life (then also from the astral one), moving away to unthinkable distances and dimensions by performing actions and experiences, and then reintegrating, should be by now established and an excellent point of reference.Even more so, a civilization that has given and left such testimonies of interdimensional development that even today we are not able to decipher them in full, had sufficient reason and knowledge to practice and prepare means to support the stages of transition of the entity that animates each single incarnation, towards the status of cosmic spiritual eternity that was due to it both before and after, provided that it had been conferred. On the other hand, if the very term reincarnation does not provide for just one, it is understandable that translating the post mortem – or any new era – into an abstruse idea of eternal life or resurrection, even if counterbalanced by a poorly concealed sense of superiority, is nothing but a sign of naivety. It would be enough to ask oneself at what age anyone can die and at what age they would be resurrected to then live it forever…  
Abbot Théophile MoreuxTo save ourselves from the tumultuous ocean of articles and sentences that are increasingly crowding the web, and instead compare some of the most accredited or eminent historical sources, it will be appropriate to take a step back in time.We meet the wellknown scholar Abbot Théophile Moreux, missionary of scientific dissemination, perhaps the most famous recent reference – probably reincarnated after having lived as Apollonius of Tyana, perhaps he himself whispers it to me, and so I propose it to you – who in his extensive investigation, after having traced the premises, begins on the official π (3.1416) with the following reflections:
The methods used to achieve this result were unknown to classical antiquity;
they are based on entirely modern considerations; yet we will see that this constant sought for so many centuries materializes, so to speak, in the Great Pyramid. «La science mystérieuse des pharaons» (1943, Abbé Th. Moreux – p.37)
A conclusion as full of emphasis as it is of contradictions, and yet selfillusory as it is based on presumed facts: that is, that modern methods are the right ones, 'and yet' we find the constant already present in the Pyramid of Giza.
A charming complacency in the absurd, for a scientist: the formulation of an irrational number sought for the next 4 thousand years is unknown, but it ‘materializes’ as if by magic in the gigantic stone architecture, the last of the 7 wonders of the globe, placed by longitude at the center of the emerged lands at 30°N and 30°E: in what fortuity should we believe? but the worst is yet to come: to achieve this miracle, with a lowcost loophole the measurements of the pyramid are adjusted so that they correspond to the squaring of the circle in the perimeter of the base, according to that π which however makes the second conditio sine qua non incompatible: the area of each façade equal to that of the height squared.
Let's add the four sides of the base of the monument, whose original value was
232 m. 805; we will have for the perimeter 931m. 22: Let it be: 4 x 232.805 = 931.22 Let's now divide the length of this perimeter by 2 times the height of the Pyramid which was 148 m 208 at the time of its construction, we will find the value of π. In fact 931.22 / (2 * 148.208) = 3.1416. Note that this result cannot be a coincidence, because according to the law formulated by Herodotus and which we have cited, the angle of the faces should have been 51°49'; however, this angle is actually 51°51' and it turns out that the ratio between the perimeter or the sum of the 4 sides of the rectangular base and the vertical height is equal to 3.1416 x 2, that is to say the ratio between the circumference of a circle and its radius; so that this monument, unique in the world, is truly the material consecration of an important value for which the human spirit has made unimaginable efforts. Where did the producers get this notion from? Always a mystery! «La science mystérieuse des pharaons» (1943, Abbé Th. Moreux – p.23)
A rather forced coincidence, we will see how later; however a mystery to be exalted, since it evokes the union of vertical and horizontal, abstract and concrete, spirit recognized in the circle, and matter in the square.
It should be noted immediately, however, that if the angle 51°51'  see below  does not correspond to that of 51°49' indicated by Herodotus (and Kepler), this invites some reflections. Herodotus could report this measurement only if it had been reported to him by someone who knew it exactly, not being able to detect it with his own means. Given this, and just as the theoretical measurement is correct precisely at 51°49', the only one that will satisfy the authentic Squaring of the Circle and all the rest with the π 3.14460, we can argue that the angle 51°51' was enough to satisfy the tendency to square a circle with a radius~height greater than enough for the π 3.14159. We will see details and confirmations of this later, in the detailed reports of W. M. Flinders Petrie.
The right angle?Calling it pi (π)’Theory, author Christopher Bartlett states:The Φ (Kepler) theory gives a theoretical angle of 51°49'38 (51.827"), while the
The Φ and Nexus Network Journal – Architecture and Mathematics
An apparent conflict, which arises only from the theory based on an incorrect π.
It will be seen that the method and the theoretical basis of Cole and Petrie's measurements differed, but the results coincided ‘within the permitted limits’ (say like between 3.1416 and 3.1446 ?)
The design of The Great Pyramid of Khufu, p.9 Determination of the Exact Size and Orientation of the Great Pyramid of Giza."
"J. H. Cole, of the Survey of Egypt, carried out a survey of the base of this pyramid in 1925, the exact size, shape and orientation of the original base of the Pyramid on the pavement. The distances were measured with the Base Line Apparatus designed by M. M. Benoit and Guillaume using 24 metre standardized invar wires. The angles were measured with a 6 inch Troughton and Simms micrometer theodolite. The method and theoretical basis of the measurements of Cole and Petrie differed, but the results coincided within the limits of the permissible error." "Determination of the Exact Size and Orientation of the Great Pyramid of Giza. By J. H. COLE.  Survey of Egypt. SURVEY OF EGYPT PAPER No. 39. Government Press, Cairo, 1925.
The graphic goniometer in the PDF naturally confirms the golden ratio, made known by Kepler, while no theory referring to the π could have a good outcome outside the set of proportions already specified between the bases, heights and edges. Although his essay itself reproduces Gantenbrink's work with merit, from that graphic one certainly cannot deduce such a precise angle; and he cannot but cite as a dispute the one between the two theories, which he calls Golden Ratio Theory and the π. It is now clear to everyone that a height of the pyramid as a radius of a circumference equal to the perimeter of the base, but calculated with π 3.14159, this being less than 3.14460, will have to be greater than that required by the real π. The greater height will cause the golden ratio of the faces to fail and their area will not be equal to the square of that radius. To give a better idea for practical evaluation, this is the
Finally, there are corners proposed here and there
51º51' 14.3", 51º 50' 39.1", 51º 50' 34.0", 51º 49' 38.3", 51º 40' 16.2", 51º 20' 25", 51°84, 51°51'46", 51°50'40", 51°826, 51°52'…
also as averages of 4 different angles and it is difficult to use the term ‘in reality’.
as it stood in the early ages of the world,
but with the secret of its nature upon it, clothed complete with its polished casingstones, bounded on every side by perfect planes, terminating in a point above, rising from a duly levelled area of rocksurface below… It was 1985, maybe '86, and it happened on impulse, on my first privately organized visit, with a few days added on purpose to the classic tourist program. Home! I also remember telling my travelling partner, when we were at the Sphinx, that there was a hidden underground connecting tunnel that connected the inside of the Sphinx with the Great Pyramid… For now, returning to Moreux: he attributes the specifications of the measurements to the celebrated researcher Piazzi Smyth ( The original dimensions
were necessarily
altered, but it is easy to correct them, as Piazzi Smyth did in 1864. According to this astronomer, to whom we owe a firstrate work on this ancient monument, the Pyramid of Cheops had a square base measuring 232 m. 805 on each side and a height of 148 m. 208 ibid. page 23
and since the great discovery hinged on the π, the one officially valid, it is not difficult to argue that the calculations had undergone a certain, albeit slight but appetizing influence, given the passion and the stakes.
In fact, the astronomer wanted to be buried under a tombstone with a shape proportionate to the great pyramid. The PDF shows in the simulation below of a cartouche dedicated to the Supreme revelation of the secrets of the Great Pyramid to the Piazzi Smyth couple, the dominant presence of the π symbol at the vertex of a triangle. Having believed so much in the magic of this simulacrum, to overwhelm any conviction at a purely scientific level, he aimed not without sagacity at the satisfaction of an otherworldly dimension. He in turn inspired many successors, who worked to put an end to this debate, without however ever being able to provide definitive proof for or against; and we should know the reasons by now. So much so that Moreux himself does not hesitate to rig the dice: this by
How close was it to being in front of the ideal dimension? A height of 485.911 (148.1056728), less than 9 hundredths of approximation, in this case 0.00018% leaving the base unchanged! and since for some reason they were relied on integers, it was natural to round to the nearest number; the same goes for the base leaving an integer value for the height, ideally 1528.278 feet (232.9095672). Nor was a rough rounding like the one reconstructed by Moreux deemed useful, after that first disappointing verification starting from the fourth number; or perhaps it was thought that it was necessary to limit oneself to whole numbers in order to respect special units of measurement in hypothesis; but whatever they were, they could only submit to the perfect balance of the golden section, which is not expressed through whole numbers (despite the pathetic worldly efforts to make it coincide with the nice Fibonacci series, which the initiated designers had absolutely no need for, and whose numerical progression certainly does not serve to round the figures). Unable to know or even suppose it, Piazzi Smyth, despite his passion, truly missed out on the immense joy of discovering what great treasure his beloved pyramid contained: the actual π which in modern times, composed of mechanics and astrophysics, is to be considered a discovery second only to that of fire. He consoles himself, or justifies in the eyes of the world a wisdom that he cannot inherit (the product of another dimension or preexisting civilization), by exalting it on the pedestal of primordiality: To have found, however, only three numbers built
in correct into the primeval building, shows a striking
achievement for that early time;
(see above)
Others instead underline their deeprooted certainty by saying:
It is therefore given that the equivalency of the area of a circle and a given square is
derived using the value of the square root of Pi (√π)
It should be understood however, that this is a theoretical equivalency since Pi is an Irrational Number and cannot be written as the ratio of two integers. This was proven by Johann H. Lambert in 1761. (22)
Furthermore, it is important to note that Pi (π) is transcendental whereby there is no polynomial with rational coefficients of which Pi is a root. This was proven by Ferdinand von Lindemann in 1882. (23) The consequence of this is that Pi is not constructible, which is to say that one cannot “construct” a circle equal in area to a square using a compass and straight edge. Therefore the theoretical equivalence is not constructible. The allure of the Square Root of Pi for the builders of the Great Pyramid, it appears, was simply that they reached the limit of the possible. “
It is not at all clear why π and Φ cannot be used in the same way; but the point is another: Lindemann only proved that the simulated Pi (π) is almost unusable, except as an ununderstood constant, ie 3.14159.
√5 , the other called transcendent, in truth of hybrid origin, different by so little as to make them usable without distinction in many circumstances, and this is what is happening; but also so much so that while the one [3.14460] is strictly connected to the constant 0.786151 3777574232860, (of which I have proposed the symbol and the name ‘Platinum’) and as such keeps a reality in perpetual and relativistic vibration standing, the other [3.14159] is not and with 0.7853981 would cause the balance of the world to collapse.
4. The Effect of Direction of Particles
As I had introduced on page 28 of my «2x2=3.14» and reiterated later on page squaringthecirclewiththetruepi, but without going too far from the basic theme, it is worthwhile in this context to give a more daring image, based on the very special parameter that is 'There exist some differences between particles receding and those approaching each other. At extremely high relativistic speeds, objects approaching each other have a repelling effect. When objects approaching each other are at 0,78615 c, their inertia equals to their gravitational affect. For particles approaching each other at still faster speeds, the gravitational effect will have a negative repelling gravitational effect. I wondered in fact if and to what extent the π takes part in the formulas that led to its official calculation; while in the case cited above, the constant could have circumvented the problem, keeping its dependence of ¼ of the golden π 3.14460, unsuspected by the researchers. The π, generally considered the ratio between a circle and its radius, should be understood as a universal constant independent of any state, which with its 4 quarters maintains equilibrium in circular motion, in gravity as in the 4 phases of wave manifestations.
As for the constant, I will simply point out that by applying to 299792458 the approximate quotient between the values
3.14460 / 3.14159, = 1.0009590…, the speed in a vacuum could approach 300079966; that in pure air (if any still exists on the planet)
oscillates for the generic refractive index
1.0002926 (incidence calculated with the usual π) around 299992188,
and with index 1.000243285 at 50° Celsius (halfway between ice and boiling), at 300006978,
values much closer to the favored, instinctively idealized formulation 3×10^{8} m/s.
It is worth remembering that in the circle of diameter = 1, the area of the inscribed Divine Triangle is √ Φ / φ^{2} = 0.30028310…, which is like saying area of the circle ÷φ^{2}
By the way, even if it constitutes the maximum speed limit in nature, declaring it the maximum speed at which any information can travel in the universe, whose boundaries we have certainly not crossed, is nothing but a completely terrestrial and untrue presumption).
And since in general relativity it is the "speed of gravity", as also expected for gravitational waves, and in a gravitational field space is curved, here we are faced with the intervention of the golden π.
In the square The fact is that no matter how many tricks one may use to square this circle, the whole vast mass of hypotheses, copied and almost never the same, conversions of conversions to make disagreements even on units of measurement and various suppositions coincide, theories all worthy in the absence of certainties, supported by a large series of bibliographical references, they will never achieve the intended purpose, even if they are satisfied with satisfactory correspondences on the basis of a golden section  degraded to an effect, crumbled in the numerical sequence devised by Fibonacci, a series which in itself does not represent any mathematical law  and of π 3.1416, an agreement which is not arithmetically possible, something already widely documented.
To draw conclusions and start from a wellfounded conclusion, if most of the analyses must contrast the descriptions of Herodotus and other ancients with the numerous interpretations and relative units of measurement adopted, it seems very difficult to support preestablished and safe figures. Since here we are only interested in the measurements connected to the declared Squaring of the Circle, we must start from the two basic concepts that are not at all significant:
It follows that every attempt to balance the accounts by adapting the measures of the pyramid involves two opposite but equally prohibitive effects:
It is hard to believe that with the precision with which the Egyptians built this
massive pyramid that there was not an intention to build it based on some important
specific design.
id. – The design of The Great Pyramid of Khufu, p.13
He is right about this, but will have to take a good part of it back due to the insufficiency of the π, diluting the supposed display "to demonstrate to the future an advanced mathematical knowledge" as transversal with respect to their “other very real spiritual and funereal concerns”.
It seems logical that this perception that pervades everyone from admiration to the inevitable frustration for the lack of a definitive answer, increases the most varied views, substituting the application of numerical ratios that if in intuition they would replace the golden ratio, in reality branch out the thought into many rivulets, disjoined from the imprint of that hieratic triangle that above all contains and represents it, π included.
It is remarkable that the proportions of the Great Pyramid have exerted such a strong and repeated attraction, as to induce many scholars to retrace it with the utmost care, even though they are aware of having to deny it but not without making sense of it, almost as if it were a tribute due to such theoretical genius.
I will then try on this page to reestablish a comparison from the works of accredited researchers, of the designs they have entrusted to history and culture, with such a decisive and fundamental imprint for all the dimensions that involve this pyramid. The first and sensible purpose in the face of too many theories is to show how in reality almost none of the outlined schemes escapes the magnetism of the Great Triangle, despite the inevitable variations and inaccuracies of time, places and calculations.
The pyramidal structure connects each side of the basic square to a single vertex, giving rise to a triangular face, which may or may not be there as a full surface, i.e. whose main function is to combine the four fundamental Essences into one: the Quintessence, ‘quinta essentia’ (in Greek pémpton stoichêion) to name the ether which in reality radiates the manifestations, vivifying them. It is crucial to understand this passage from the number 4 to the number 5 (or vice versa), since geometrically the circumference with center at the vertex and radius up to the base is transmuted, so to speak, transfiguring itself into the base perimeter, of which it is the 'root' by virtue of the golden ratio between their bodies, which we have seen to be: √ Φ on base Φ .
It is in the study carried out on the fifth level golden spiral that I had already highlighted how the number 5 is the determining radical in any formulation of the Golden Section, of which I repeat only a brief indicative passage: √ [0.05 + 0.05 + 0.05 + 0.05 + 0.05] + 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.118 ,
in short √ 0.5^{2} × 5 on a base ,
which leads to both 0.618 and 1.618 , which multiplied together make 1 .
A breakdown to the minimum terms that could be considered banal, if it did not make it clear how: And as I was able to represent in my hypothesis of spiral and antispiral, the Vortex can be traced back to the Φ, a whirlwind that forcefully gathers, feeds, destroys! All the word "pyramid" needed was to be translated as "fire in the middle." A simple screw can give an idea of its penetrating capacity, but to imagine its power, thinking of a cyclone might not be enough. In this experimental photo based on a Tesla coil, taken in 1979 with a Kirlian camera, you can notice the movement of the vertical energy flow in a double helix, which also brings the thought back to DNA. The Squaring of the Circle is not only a geometric need but an instinctive, or rather esoteric, need, translated for centuries into the alchemical search for the Philosopher's Stone, lapis philosophorum, secret conversion factor between the creature and its vital source; about which you can read the most learned nonsense on the web, as always from those who feel obliged to label what they do not know or understand  let it be said to warn those who are not prepared.
8.10 Science presents the universe
as being matter possessing consciousness
but the truth is:
8.10.1 The universe is C
3.102 Before I continue with this account of my life on earth,
I want to stress again that
Squaring the Circle is a miracle and a vehicle of the Motivating Force, the Prime Mover of Existence that induces particles to the density and form[ation] of elements and governs their motion.
everything in the universe is a particular and individualised S The mathematical and geometric realization, Intelligences of Creation, Φ, is concretized [meta]physically speaking all here: configured and applied in a functional way in the pyramidal structure that has been given to us. In light of these premises, it is much more difficult to ascertain what the task assigned to the Great Pyramid was, than its certain and virtual measurements. There is an almost global disagreement on both postulates; but if there is a given relationship that emerges unassailable and eloquent, here it is in the Divine Golden Triangle.
repetita iuvant
Why pyramid?
This is demonstrated even better, if it were nothing more than a whim, by applying the same diagonal cut to the doubleheight rectangle, and completing the figure on the right side to highlight the multiplication of four equal golden triangles. On the side, a distribution of the four could not be missed, circular and symmetrical on the circle, since they highlight how the doublehatched green square, whose sides cross the intersections of the circle with all 4 triangles, is exactly the one that squares the circle itself. It follows that the segment joining the two intersections of the blue circle with the sides of the triangle, extended to the perpendiculars to the two ends of the base, is the side of that square centered in the equivalent circle. One last minor curiosity – the red one which has the same area, rotated until the vertices coincide with the bases of the triangles, also touches the vertices of the perimeter green intersecting the rectangle with them. The 4 profiles should not be confused with the faces of the pyramid. If bu luck the first statement does not use π, leaving the burden of absolute correspondence to Φ and this allows us to ascertain the exact value of π from the equality between the circumference with radius, height of the pyramid and its base perimeter – the absolute relationship between the four faces and the function of squaring or quartering the circle is maintained, from the moment in which for each triangle inclined towards the apex, the ratio between ½base ÷ its height is Φ, and therefore the square of the constant ratio that we will see, between ½base ÷ height of the pyramid. This inverse relationship means that if in our pyramid profile inscribed in a circle with diameter = 1 and circumference = π, the height of the pyramid is Φ, the height of the faces is √ Φ, that's to say 0.78615, which ideally configures four rays that make up the π, departing from the vertex to frame and distribute its effect up to the four cardinal directions, or cyclical phases mentioned several times in my articles, to which the base of the solid construction is oriented. The same four rays that delimit the section profile two by two on the NorthSouth and EastWest axes In other words, it is the same ½base that starting from the center of the square of the base, in the pyramid profile relates to 0.78615_{¼π} on the oblique side, while starting from each of its corners in the 4 faces it relates to 0.78615_{¼π} as their height! This is valid for any type of squarebased pyramid, but in this one the dominant ones are the π and that exchange of values for which if in the section of the pyramid Φ is the height, in each face ½base ÷ height is Φ. In short, or should I say in sum, π and Φ they are modalized in the four facades that at the vertex (energy) join the hinges of the slowed mass, in ideal balance for each side or phase of the construction. Does it make sense to imagine something casual in all this unrepeatable perfection? The above example means that any ratio between the height and ½ base side of the pyramid, [ for us: 0,61803398874989484820458681467588 ÷ 0,48586827175664567818286387589454 ] that is actually divergent from the √ Φ , say
1.2720196495140,
due to the variation of the height or the side, will not allow the equality of circumference and perimeter; which in fact inevitably occurs with the π = 3.1416 even respecting the aforementioned ratio for the areas. I know I'm just repeating myself, but it will serve to highlight that in some respects it is the numbers that decide… even the meanings.
T
If in the case of the circle of unit diameter everything is immediate, since the constant is the very measure of the sides, on the open ground, in short, two axioms define the cut of this precious 'stone', in the perspective of simple proportions, but at the same time of indepth ponderation:

Year  Source  Side  Height  side /2 /height  π (sd *2 *hg) 
1840  Howard Vyse  232,8  148,2  0,7854251012  3,141700405 
1865  Piazzi Smyth, John Taylor  232,8672  148,1328  0,7860075  3,14403 
1883  Flinders Petrie  230,348  146,71  0,7850453275  3,14018131 
1925  J, H, Cole  230,363  146,731  0,7849840  3,139936346 
1971  Livio Stecchini  230,363  146,512  0,7861574479  3.144629791 
Doctor Stecchini, who in the February issue of ABS has related the original alphabet with a previous divinatory numerical system, summarizes here the results of the research on the origin of the measurements. The world's measurement systems probably have a common root in ancient Mesopotamia.
In some cultures they had a religious aura; in Greece they gave rise to the dispute between Protagoras, according to whom “man is the measure of all things,” and Plato, according to whom “God is the measure of all things.” In the modern world, many theoretical misunderstandings arise because scientists and humanists have forgotten the true nature of measure. https://journals.sagepub,com/doi/abs/10,1177/000276426100400706
 
1997  Mark Lehner (estimation)  230,33  146,59  0,7856265775  3.14250631 
2000  Roger HerschFischler  230,4  146,6  0,7858117326  3,14324693 
HerzFischler presents a variety of charts on these relationships for the observed and measured quantities found within each theory. Fortunately for the reader,
decimal places are only taken out to the thousandths place. NEXUS NETWORK JOURNAL  VOL, 3, NO 2, 2001 197

It would be fun to point this out to Pi Day enthusiasts!
 
2001  John F. Pile (no inspection)  230,356  146,649  0,7853991504  3.141596601 
If any other researchers did not disdain some artifice in order to see a legend fulfilled, they did nothing but make a hole in the water.
We see in fact that John F. Pile, photographer and interior design expert is the only one to achieve the optimal result 3.141596601; he produced it at the table, with: “no inspection” and perhaps even proposing to endorse the theory of π!; and it was practically copied
by Farid Atiya up to the 9th decimal place…  
2007  Zahi Hawass  230,37  146,59  0,7857630125  3,14305205 
2009  Farid Atiya (F, Pile copy)  230,356  146,649  0,7853991504  3.141596601 
2010  Stephen Brabin  230,348  146,59  0,7856879733  3,142751893 
From the elliptical circumference of the Earth with the right π the base would increase, with a ratio even closer to 3.1446 – «The_Incomplete_Pyramids» by Stephen Brabin  
2014  Christopher Bartlett (trial)  230,363  146,515  0,786141350  3,14456540 
Its total average that from 230,478 /146,726 *2 leads to a π of 3,14161, can only affirm assorted ad hoc measures, including duplicates and excluding other cases, perhaps still with the intent to privilege the theory of π, despite the frustrating evidence that such a value cannot satisfy both basic postulates being in disagreement with the golden section; and it is really not the case to console oneself with the first three decimals. 
Rest assured that the Great Pyramid is a finished, perfect cosmic device still full of secrets, to which the creativity of researchers will neither add nor take away anything, whatever their point of view.
As for those inevitable desecrators who like to boast of sarcasm, they do not deserve too much attention; sometimes the court jesters were allowed to mock even the kings.
After all, if it can be difficult to argue on the basis of certain notions, it is even more difficult to attempt it on notions that one does not have.
Only the environment and the human rage over the centuries have removed from sight those measures that can never be recovered in solid; but they have not prevented it from transmitting to us the most important messages, first of all the access to the Divine Triangle and from this to the true π.
Although two of the earliest and most accredited explorers of the Great Pyramid came less close than others, for the 1925 measurements Petrie reports better:
By π theory  51° 51' 14" ·3  
Khufu's pyramid  51° 50' 40"  ±1' 5"  
Sneferu's pyramid  51° 52'  ±2' ?  
The dimensions found are:  

Khufu's,  height  7,  circuit  44, x 40 cubits.  
di Snefru  ''  7,  ''  44, x 25 cubiti. 
1881  1925  
N. side  9069”4  3' 20"  230.36276   9065”1  2' 23"  230.25354 
E. side  9067”7  3' 57"  230.31958   9073”0  5' 30"  230.4542 
S. side  9069”5  3' 41"  230.3653   9070”5  I' 57"  230.3907 
W. side  068”6  3' 54"  230.34244   9069”2  2' 30"  230.35768 
M  9068”8  3' 43"  230.34752   9069”4  3' 6"  230.36276 
The following update, more or less interesting in this context, for its reference to planetary orbits, from «Planetary Correlation of the Giza Pyramids», although not far from my research for the astroseismic discipline that I started in 2011, given the care taken in the technicalgraphic format, it offers me an additional opportunity to verify the correspondence of the pyramid profile to the Golden Triangle, superimposed in yellow. From W. M. F. Petrie 1965 and Today, in the year 2014
Nevertheless, the base and height measurements according to H. Vyse seem to be the only ones that take into account the complete dimensions of the pyramidal structure and are therefore close to those of the Upuaut instrumental
If I remember correctly, way back in 2002 I directly converted the measurements obtained from Gantembrunk's
It is recognized that Egyptian hieroglyphics were written on three cognitive levels, whose redefinition can vary greatly depending on who interprets it.
In short: the common one, for those who knew how to read and administer, the cultured one with more erudite content, and the hieratic one intended by those who were initiated.
In his book “The Egyptian Hieroglyph Metaphysical Language”, Moustafa Gadalla refers to them as
Imitative, Figurative, Allegorical; but his is also a current metaphysical interpretation, not priestly, or in any case aimed at uninitiated people.
Since it seems that there is no stone in this mountain of wonders, whose placement has no reason to exist, it deserves at least some diagram of what has been described, naturally sticking to the profile already defined, in scale 10px = 0.1 m, with perfect harmony of data and results..
The scholar Petrie has described with essentiality and precision significant details, which find precise confirmation in the model that I present; but will they find the same in all those that differ in the measures? How many authors will have taken the trouble to verify it?
It should be kept in mind that each perimeter is primarily indicative, an abstract linear composition, devoid of consistency if not theoretical and representative, which delimits an area that is instead form and substance.
I will try to adapt the analysis to Petrie's descriptive tone, reporting the numerical results for verification purposes on my own graphic layout.
Let's start from
2329,134 /2 * 1481,352
= 1725133,654584 /2 = 862566,827292
2329,134 *2 / 1481,352
= π 3,14460 )
Its creators were able to project the Quadrature of a Circle of radius Φ onto three dimensions by creating a pyramid that had for its height its radius, and
½base of length equal to the radius × its square root:
Φ √½base × Φ ÷
, an equality that even the most advanced calculators struggle to achieve.
The basic model is one and transcendent, like the ratio √Φ/φ = Φ, and that
½base × 4
For any real radius, the formula switches to:
½base = radius ÷ √ φ.
It seems that it is the zeros that suggest the limit of definition necessary for a fairly correct use of the most common irrational constants, such asΦ: 0.61803 e φ: 1.61803, φ^{2}: 2.61803, √ Φ: 1.27201.
The exception is √ Φ: 0.7861513777574232860, for only 1 millionth, however engaged with the 5 most significant decimals ×4 in the formation of the absolutely eloquent π 3.14460.
To tell the truth, the same Fire Power of the Great Golden Triangle will still struggle to be fully understood today, and all that is mysterious and has been widely propagated over the centuries and partly proven, remains the object of different lines of observation; but the times are evolving towards a higher vibratory level of human consciousness. As I have already underlined, Kepler himself had only half the sense of it.
The basic problem that technically persists derives in all cases from having to rely on a π reset in modern times, which has the capacity to invalidate any indepth verification, with figures of at least 24 decimal places allowed by modern calculators, sufficient to guarantee the effective coexistence of π and φ in the proportions, even if virtual, of the monument.After all, it is unthinkable that having depicted 230 real meters in a publication from two centuries ago would distinguish those differences that oscillate from 3.1416 to 3.1446; however, only in certain more recent graphs, too improvised or arbitrary, the superposition does not correspond even on a visual level.
At the same time I find it impossible to have conceived this colossal project on the basis of approximate notions, in this case an enormous geometric stilt house, but whose hypnotic correspondence would have come to stir such an endless range of hypotheses… all without a definitive connection.
Nevertheless, even if it were, this would have offered, or reopened to the undersigned the way to the Great Triangle, the 'third treasure of geometry' with all its essential contents, developed in this and other Web domains of mine, up to the π capable, precisely ad hoc, of closing the circle of such notions, even if a posteriori.
Today the question in front of the graphs produced and compared is always the same: is a nearly invisible gap in the paths sufficient to evade the essential model? or rather does it reconfirm it, with the tolerance limits assumed?!
Furthermore, it is not clear how all the authors can verify millimeters of measurement, if not as signs of presumed calculations or ones adapted to their own reference models, certainly more than to actual instrumental equipment or onsite measurements.A final note, personal one. Any more or less qualified scholar could entrench behind the idea that all this work is nothing more than a dream of mine, distinct from the actual reality of the monument. An opinion that I would not fail to respect, but not without having pointed out that, if that were the case, it would still be a geometrically and mathematically impeccable dream.
A dream that probably developed from having lain down inside the "sarcophagus", a few thousand years ago, or perhaps in a dream.
That ark without a lid, sounding like a bell, of which the volume of the void is equivalent to the volume of the full (content and container), a design criterion which suggests that a lid would have been superfluous, which in turn should prove that it was not intended to house a mummy, from which it is clear that Pharaoh Cheops was not intended for it, much less that he was its creator: all conventions, which have never been proven.
Without prejudice to the irrefutable Great Golden Triangle as a model of proportions, if the pyramid had ever decreased in height by more than 10%, the base itself would have had to shrink equally and for the same causes, unless it is demonstrated how much and what material could be conveniently removed from the top only; but 10% at the base means a good 23 meters, while the stone facings were not 11 meters thick.
One of the largest stones left at the bottom is about 1.5 x 2.4 m high at the base, and weighs about 14 tons. Some calculations suggest that all the facing stones in place would have the effect of gigantic mirrors, reflecting a light so intense that it would be visible from the moon as if it were a shining star on earth.
Strabo describes them as making the pyramid appear: “a building brought down from the sky, untouched by human hands”.Year  Perihelion  Distance  Aphelion  Distance 

2024  3 gen 1.38  147.100.632 km  5 lug 7.06  152.099.968 km 
2025  4 gen 14.28  147.103.686 km  3 lug 21.54  152.087.738 km 
2026  3 gen 18.15  147.099.894 km  6 lug 19.30  152.087.774 km 
2027  3 gen 3.32  147.104.592 km  5 lug 7.05  152,100,481 km 
2028  5 gen 13.28  147.100.687 km  4 lug 0.18  152.093.129 km 
* All aphelion/perihelion times are in local Pisa time. 
In any case, there would not be much to “violate”, except the intelligence of the reader. If the member Moosbrugger is not enough, this new precursor is introduced: Harry Lear, who in turn makes it an object of alarm for science – the only just and noteworthy cause – but does not at all demonstrate the error of the value 3.14159, nor the absoluteness of π 3.14460.
He also proposes a series of ideal analogies by applying the π 3.1446 to the comparison of 3.1416, always losing; but these are only some certifications on his part, out of who knows how many other possible ones.
Although copyrighted, which is not allowed for any mathematical procedure, no absolute demonstrations take place.
This is attested by the simple fact that even if only one were really so, there would be no need for the others.
Perhaps this is why at the end he invites anyone who wants to experiment with cutting a milled multilayer model with a diameter of one meter.
Incidentally, I kindly contacted him following the invitation on his site, but my comment was trashed.
The circle is transcendent and it is transcendence: it can inscribe or circumscribe in any dimension, but there is no possibility of converting it directly into any alternative geometric figure.
Likewise, I think the π cannot be demonstrated oneway, it can only be chosen, once focused it sufficiently.
Or better yet, grasp its essence by trusting in modern atomic physics, which gives us the 0.78615 applied to the speed of light, universal constant which if multiplied by four it generates π, and squared Φ 0.618 which – I must stress this one last time – is the true Golden Section.
As I have already exposed in detail, if the area of the square is Φ, that of the circle of equal perimeter is its square root 0.78615.
Whoever assumes the number φ 1.618 as the Golden Section incurs a double oversight: first of all 1.618 cannot be defined as the golden section of 1, since the value and concept itself of any “section” cannot be greater than unity; and then because 1.618 acts as a screen that precludes the correct visioninterpretation of the aforementioned genesis of π 3.14460 and its ratio with quarter circles and wave phases, established by the universal value 0.78615 which I call or Platinum, from which the golden ratio itself comes. It's nothing but the magical combination of 1 + Φ = 1 ÷ Φ.
The number 1.2720 is just the result of √.φ, it does not seem to be a significant constant like it is 0.78615 √.Φ; let's say that it is at the opposite pole of the path; I see it as a kind of dead end, devoid of indications, which does not support phenomenal reality as such.
After all, all my research up to the true π came from focusing the golden circles from the outside to the center of the pyramid vertical section, in symbiosis with that Divine Triangle whose sides represent all of this to the highest degree.
I would like to reiterate my opinion that it is the golden ratio that derives from π, of which ¼ (according to common usage) ie is in any case the root, the prime mover, not the opposite, even if it is or will be discovered later.
Can anyone give me a good reason to prefer the artificial π 3.14159 to 3.14460? or prove to me at this point that the first is mathematically more valid and reliable?
Mathematical calculations and demonstrations about which 23 pages by Guido Moosbrugger are cited as well, never exposed on the web as such.
Besides the fragment reproduced above as a relic, of his book I only see news indexed on UFOs and alien encounters, which prompted me to stumble upon Billy Meier with his flaunted 'Henoch prophecies '.
Above all this, the truth π = √Φ × 4 has always and steadily shone in the construct of the pyramid, the leitmotif of the current discussion, which places it before the eyes of those who want to see and examine it thoroughly.
As for the asteroid Apophis, at the century ‘99942’, for the Egyptians deity of chaos, destruction and antagonist of Ra the sun, it has been estimated that such a large body comes so close to the Earth only once every 5 thousand/10 thousand years…
Well, the problem could not be limited to an impact, considered more probable just recently, but in my opinion extend to gravitational effects and others, due to the interaction of its repeated passage (20292036) with the Earth's gravitational field, capable of interfering with the polar equilibrium.
The 10,000 years, which could make one think of the 11,500 years long associated with the shifting of the poles, are upon us,
I would not like to venture hypotheses that go beyond my preparation, but in my fouryear commitment to astroseismology (20112014), in which I calculated and related daily orbital relations in the solar system with earthquake events (like this one, still systematic objects of thousands of consultations since 2014 by scholars, certainly not bloggers), not without various predictions that hit the mark, also addressed to INGV via Twitter, despite its small size of 375 km it should not be overlooked that Pluto, in my experience in astroseismology, despite being the farthest from Earth and only about 6.32 times larger than the asteroid, has always been one of the most dangerous presences, when involved by precise aspects in geocentric configurations; I have always thought of wave issues, or of resonance even more than gravity; but then I dealt with something else.
The first passage in 1929 could therefore be only preparatory to the one 7 years later; not of "an enormous cosmic catastrophe" but rather of the unpostponable end of a world that the time has come to renew; even if the intervention of the destroyer Apophis was only symbolic.
All this stimulates me to leave you with another game, an eloquent and pleasant puzzle, which I offer precisely to take you back on my steps as I write.
You will be amazed if you patiently observe this wonderful sequence and the correspondences of these circles, all drawn starting from the external red [1] according to a progressive golden reduction of their diameters; except one, the smaller one in blue dashes [2], which has a diameter equal to the radius of the primary, with two of its golden reductions at the base.
It will lead directly to a double quadrature, already summarized at the end of the home page, but not explained except within the site.
The circle [1] has radius Φ [0.618].
We want to draw a circle with radius = 0.5 [golden ratio monad], passing through its center, and see how they interact.
You will recall from the parent figure of the Great Triangle, that the center of the new circle will be located at the point of the radius Φ which is distant from the circumference ½Φ^{3} [0.118]; the intersection with any radius [here vertical] of a circle Φ^{2}, will divide the radius into two parts, of which the center of the smaller will be the center to draw the circle [3], in the second figure.
With a ruler and compass it could also be obtained by joining the intersections of two circles of radius Φ^{3}, one tangent to Φ^{4} and to the base of Φ^{1} [1], the other centered at the lower end of the radius; among other things it will be exactly inscribed in the triangle abd that I describe below.
As you can see, it is also the center of the second reduction ×Φ of the circle [2], which is always equal to ½Φ^{3} with perfect bilateral tangency.
I would just like to point out the incredible series of correspondences that manifest a hidden but pervasive harmony of every functional connection.
Having drawn the circle [3] from its center C and radius extended to the center of the circle [1] then = 0.5, the segment bd that joins the intersection points of this [3] with the circle [1] performs several tasks.
First of all it outlines the Quadrature [green] of the Circle [1], which overlaps symmetrically precisely through its extremes; then it is the base of the golden triangle bda in which each side introduces the squaring of the circle [3], and finally the base of the same triangle abd which, rotated by approximately 76°352 on the vertex b becomes a side of the larger Golden Triangle bcd, pertaining to the circle [1] and endowed with new special combinations with the general golden plan, for the unexpected correspondences of intersections, and those qualities of tangentiality which led to its discovery.
I then added to fig. 2 a golden triangle rotated 90°, with the base adjacent to a vertical side of the square, in such a position that the vertex corresponds to the intersection of the base of the square with the radius that joins the 2 circles (an effect of the bitmap pixels reduces the precision, which however is clearly visible in the PDF, the stimulating exploration of which I leave to the reader who is as curious as I am): and I discover that it is tangent to the circle Φ^{2}; at its point of intersection with the golden triangle.
Immediately next to it, it crosses the intersection of two other circles: the main Φ^{2} with the one inscribed in the golden triangle obtained, the base of the golden triangle reduced to 50% (pink), and inverted at the center of the golden triangle of the circle [3], which together develops tangentiality and connections at the vertices with three other significant circles [blue].
This is just a small sample of what Φ can do!
Being just an illustrative whim, I didn't program everything in PostScript, so it may not be perfect in some details, but it is not lacking in accuracy and selfproving validity.
As for my personal work in this space of mathematics, it has been done not to appear as a discovery, exclusive or not, but to urge men to finally understand and receive the precious inheritance they have received.
And to begin with, to correct the π, for the good of all.