And that this primary factor of universal reality should remain disconnected from the other treasures, which geometry has bestowed on us from the beginning, to be relegated to abstruse and discontinuous approaches? its solution, finally open, is:
“The square root of equilibrium”.
In a line there is no equilibrium, in the circle everything is; and in it is composed and opposed that quadratic ‘gearing’ which I am about to reassert, of which our current π is just a multiple.
A constant that would regulate inter alia the gravitational balance between particles:
4. The Effect of Direction of Particles
There exist some differences between particles receding and those approaching each other. At extremely high relativistic speeds, objects approaching each other have a repelling effect. When objects approaching each other are at 0.78615 c, their inertia equals to their gravitational affect.
For particles approaching each other at still faster speeds, the gravitational effect will have a negative repelling gravitational effect. …
The circle represents perfection. To the point of making me even doubt that in our world any perfectly circular structure exists !
The π humanly estabished, in comparison it is only its imperfect and transitory arrangement, an almost conquest; and perhaps this one in the dictates of the I
A truth that will not fail to be quickly revalued, well or badly enunciated as it is, from celestial mechanics to terrestrial mechanics and all the other disciplines that are most involved and responsible.
That if we wanted to tacitly ignore it at first glance, such a position (not new in history) would rest only on such a slight approximation of 3.14 as to keep its use almost unchanged, including defect (better to re-approximate 6.28 to 6.29); but to whatever reason it was connected it will not be able to hold out for long, since perspicuity will make its way as time matures and with the inevitable certification in the most committed and demanding sectors of use.
A position which I had already experienced as far back as 2009, facing the opinion of an expert operator, here again, of Wikipedia, who refused the presentation and algebraic demonstration of the first properties of the same golden triangle, contesting it with the written declaration that:
"The self-evidence of mathematics has been over for twenty centuries now"